| dc.contributor.author | Hill, Nathan | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-28T17:16:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-02-28T17:16:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | en |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hill, Nathan W., The Evidence for Chinese *-r, Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 9, 2, 2016, 190-204 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1933-6985 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Y | en |
| dc.description | PUBLISHED | en |
| dc.description.abstract | In 1989 Starostin proposed that Old Chinese had a final *-r that later changed to -n (and sometimes -j). Baxter & Sagart subsequently incorporated Starostin’s proposal in their 2014 Old Chinese reconstructions. This essay attempts to assemble the evidence for Old Chinese final *-r and to elaborate an explicit notation for the relative strength of this evidence for reconstructing an *-r in particular words. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 190-204 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 9 | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2 | en |
| dc.rights | Y | en |
| dc.subject | Old Chinese | en |
| dc.subject | historical phonology | en |
| dc.subject | rhotics | en |
| dc.subject | reconstruction | en |
| dc.title | The Evidence for Chinese *-r | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.type.supercollection | scholarly_publications | en |
| dc.type.supercollection | refereed_publications | en |
| dc.identifier.peoplefinderurl | http://people.tcd.ie/hillna | en |
| dc.identifier.rssinternalid | 222782 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902003 | en |
| dc.rights.ecaccessrights | openAccess | |
| dc.identifier.orcid_id | 0000-0001-6423-017X | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2262/102201 | |
