Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeegan, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T15:59:53Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T15:59:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022en
dc.identifier.citationSebastiano Di Luzzo, Richard Keegan, Roberto Liolli, Massimiliano Schiraldi, Key activity indicators: critical review and proposal of implementation criteria, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2022en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractPurpose This paper discusses the concept, definition and usage of Key Activity Indicators (KAIs) and their integration within a Performance Measurement and Management system (PMM). Design/methodology/approach The actual definition and application areas of the KAIs are determined through a systematic literature review. Successively, a thorough definition of Key Activity Indicators is provided, along with a set of criteria for their deployment. Lastly, a case involving a Large Scale Retail Trade (LSRT) company is reported to report an example for guiding KAIs adoption. Findings This research shows that the scientific background concerning KAIs is still not mature. Moreover, the paper defines the role of KAIs for measuring operational activities and their possible connection with Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Research limitations/implications Although KAIs have been introduced and discussed in the scientific literature; there is no evidence of criteria to deploy these indicators, leaving organizations without any guidance for their operational implementation. Practical implications From an academic standpoint, the study provides an overview of the usage of KAIs within the present scientific contributions, showing the advancements of this research field. From an industrial standpoint, the research proposes a set of criteria for the organizational deployment of KAIs. Originality/value The study investigates the concept of KAIs that, besides being originally conceived within World Class Manufacturing (WCM), has not received much attention in the scientific literature.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectKey Activity Indicatorsen
dc.subjectKey Performance Indicatorsen
dc.subjectPerformance measurement and managementen
dc.subjectOperational Excellence Modelsen
dc.subjectPeople Developmenten
dc.subjectHuman Factoren
dc.titleKey activity indicators: critical review and proposal of implementation criteriaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/rkeegan
dc.identifier.rssinternalid251731
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJPPM-01-2022-0023
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagOPERATIONS MANAGEMENTen
dc.subject.TCDTagStrategic Management/ Strategyen
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/102290


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record