Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollier, Marcusen
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T10:50:02Z
dc.date.available2023-06-29T10:50:02Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.date.submitted2023en
dc.identifier.citationPineda-Pinto, M.; Kennedy, C.; Collier, M.J.; Cooper, C.; O Donnell, M.; Nulty, F.; Rodriguez Casta�eda, N., Finding justice in wild, novel ecosystems: a review through a multispecies lens, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 83, 2023, 127902en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.descriptionThough most cities, particularly in the Global North, have been intensely modified by human activities certain locations still exist in varied forms of abandonment or disinvestment, often allowing for new species assemblages to flourish. These urban novel ecosystems or informal wild spaces are often perceived as in-between or overlooked, calling into question their value and social-ecological role, while also creating tensions amongst different groups and stakeholders who share different visions for their use and management. Within these tensions, issues of justice and equity can be more pronounced and surface historic legacies of environmental contamination, inequitable development, and extraction. Despite this, very little is known about the social-ecological role informal wild spaces play in urban areas, and how best to interrogate and understand the equity and justice dimensions they elicit. To fill this gap in knowledge, this paper critically examines the literature on urban novel ecosystems in relation to justice, with a particular interest in multispecies justice. Through this analysis, gaps in the literature are exposed, while also arguing the informality, neglect and contestation of wild urban spaces provides opportunities to explore issues of access, benefits and harms, particularly in light of global climate and ecological crises. A systematic approach is utilized to search the literature, identifying 45 papers which are thematically analyzed under a justice lens. The study identifies three themes that thread throughout the literature: distributional injustices relate to perceptions and attitudes, which give rise or arise from injustices; the regeneration discourse focuses on a �new nature�, which is based on social-ecological displacement and devaluation; and the potential of urban wild spaces to generate new multispecies sensibilities. The paper concludes by discussing trends, gaps, and emerging discourses, and proposing a multispecies justice approach for urban planning through the learnings and engagement with urban wild, novel ecosystems.en
dc.description.abstractMainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities has grown in scale and magnitude in recent times but is still considered to be the main challenge for transitioning our cities and their communities to be more climate resilient and liveable: environmentally, economically, and socially. Furthermore, taking nature-based solutions to the next level, and scaling them out to all urban contexts to achieve a greater impact, is proving to be slow and often conflicts with other transitioning initiatives such as energy generation, mobility and transport initiatives, and infilling to combat sprawl. So, the task is neither easy nor straightforward; there are many barriers to this novel transition, especially when it comes to collaborative approaches to implementing nature-based solutions with diverse urban communities and within city authorities themselves. This paper reports on a new process that is systematically co-produced and captured as a framework for planning nature-based solutions that emerged during the Connecting Nature project. The Connecting Nature Framework is a three-stage, iterative process that involves seven key activity areas for mainstreaming nature-based solutions: technical solutions, governance, financing and business models, nature-based enterprises, co-production, reflexive monitoring, and impact assessment. The tested and applied framework is designed to address and overcome barriers to the implementation of nature-based solutions in cities via a co-created, iterative, and reflective approach. The planning process guided by the proposed framework has already yielded promising results with some of the cities of the project, though further usage and its adoption by other cities is needed to explore its potential in different contexts especially in the Global South. The paper concludes with suggestions on how this may be realised.en
dc.format.extent127902en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUrban Forestry and Urban Greeningen
dc.relation.ispartofseries83en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectNovel ecosystemsen
dc.subjectInformal wild spacesen
dc.subjectJusticeen
dc.subjectCitiesen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen
dc.titleFinding justice in wild, novel ecosystems: a review through a multispecies lensen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/colliemaen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid256596en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127902en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeIdentities in Transformationen
dc.subject.TCDThemeInternational Developmenten
dc.subject.TCDThemeInternational Integrationen
dc.subject.TCDThemeSmart & Sustainable Planeten
dc.subject.TCDTagCITIESen
dc.subject.TCDTagClimate Justiceen
dc.subject.TCDTagE3en
dc.subject.TCDTagInformal wild spacesen
dc.subject.TCDTagJusticeen
dc.subject.TCDTagNOVEL ECOSYSTEMSen
dc.subject.TCDTagNature Positive Economyen
dc.subject.TCDTagNovelEcoen
dc.subject.TCDTagREWILDINGen
dc.subject.TCDTagSYSTEMATIC REVIEWen
dc.identifier.rssurihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866723000730?via%3Dihuben
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-6853-9980en
dc.subject.darat_thematicAttitudesen
dc.subject.darat_thematicDevelopmenten
dc.subject.darat_thematicEnvironment and housingen
dc.subject.darat_thematicPolicyen
dc.subject.darat_thematicSocial exclusionen
dc.subject.darat_thematicSocial participationen
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Council (ERC)en
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber101002440en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/103000


Files in this item

Thumbnail
No Thumbnail [100%x80]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record