Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichards, Derek
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T11:15:23Z
dc.date.available2023-11-28T11:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023en
dc.identifier.citationLee, Chi Tak, Harty, Siobhan, Adegoke, Adedeji, Palacios, Jorge, Gillan, Claire M., Richards, Derek, The Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Psychological Interventions for Comorbid Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Long-Term Conditions: A Real-World Naturalistic Observational Study in IAPT Integrated Care, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2023 Sep 11en
dc.identifier.issn1070-5503
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low-intensity psychological interventions may be a cost-effective, accessible solution for treating depression and anxiety in patients with long-term conditions, but evidence from real-world service settings is lacking. This study examined the effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions provided in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme in England for patients with and without long-term conditions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients (total N = 21,051, long-term conditions n = 4024) enrolled in three low-intensity psychological interventions, i.e. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), guided self-help (GSH), and psychoeducational group therapy (PGT) within a Talking Therapies service from 2016 to 2020. Primary outcomes included pre-post-treatment changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7). Results: Overall, both cohorts significantly improved on all outcomes post-treatment, with large effect sizes. Patients with long-term conditions experienced a greater reduction in depression while those without experienced a greater reduction in anxiety, but these differences were marginal (< 1 score difference on both measures). No difference between the cohorts was shown when comparing the differential effectiveness across interventions, but those engaging in iCBT showed greater reduction in depression and anxiety than those in GSH and PGT, while those in GSH improved more than PGT. Conclusions: Low-intensity psychological interventions, particularly iCBT, were effective in treating depression and anxiety in patients with long-term conditions in a real-world service setting. Our large-scale study supports the continued and increased implementation of low-intensity psychological interventions for this subpopulation via integrated care.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectReal worlden
dc.subjectAnxietyen
dc.subjectDepressionen
dc.subjectLong-term conditionen
dc.subjectPsychological comorbiditiesen
dc.subjectPsychological interventionsen
dc.titleThe Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Psychological Interventions for Comorbid Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Long-Term Conditions: A Real-World Naturalistic Observational Study in IAPT Integrated Careen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/drichard
dc.identifier.rssinternalid259107
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10215-9
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagClinical Psychologyen
dc.subject.TCDTagPsychologyen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-0871-4078
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/104211


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record