dc.contributor.author | Richards, Derek | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-16T10:58:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-16T10:58:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2024 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Hisler G.C., Young K.S., Cumpanasoiu D.C., Palacios J.E., Duffy D., Enrique A., Keegan D., Richards D., Incorporating a deep-learning client outcome prediction tool as feedback in supported internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety: A randomised controlled trial within routine clinical practice, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2024 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 17461405 14733145 | |
dc.identifier.other | Y | |
dc.description | PUBLISHED | en |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Machine learning techniques have been leveraged to predict client psychological treatment outcomes. Few studies, however, have tested whether providing
such model predictions as feedback to therapists improves client outcomes. This randomised controlled trial examined (1) the effects of implementing therapist feedback
via a deep- learning model (DLM) tool that predicts client treatment response (i.e.,
reliable improvement on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] or Generalized
Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) to internet- delivered cognitive behavioural therapy
(iCBT) in routine clinical care and (2) therapist acceptability of this prediction tool.
Methods: Fifty-one therapists were randomly assigned to access the DLM tool (vs.
treatment as usual [TAU]) and oversaw the care of 2394 clients who completed repeated PHQ-9 and GAD-7 assessments.
Results: Multilevel growth curve models revealed no overall differences between the
DLM tool vs. TAU conditions in client clinical outcomes. However, clients of therapists
with the DLM tool used more tools, completed more activities and visited more platform pages. In subgroup analyses, clients predicted to be ‘not- on-track’ were statistically significantly more likely to have reliable improvement on the PHQ-9 in the DLM
vs. TAU group. Therapists with access to the DLM tool reported that it was acceptable
for use, they had positive attitudes towards it, and reported it prompted greater examination and discussion of clients, particularly those predicted not to improve.
Conclusion: Altogether, the DLM tool was acceptable for therapists, and clients engaged more with the platform, with clinical benefits specific to reliable improvement
on the PHQ-9 for not-on-track clients. Future applications and considerations for implementing machine learning predictions as feedback tools within iCBT are discussed | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Counselling and Psychotherapy Research; | |
dc.rights | Y | en |
dc.subject | deep learning, feedback-informed treatment, machine learning, not-on-track, SilverCloud, internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy | en |
dc.title | Incorporating a deep-learning client outcome prediction tool as feedback in supported internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety: A randomised controlled trial within routine clinical practice | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.type.supercollection | scholarly_publications | en |
dc.type.supercollection | refereed_publications | en |
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurl | http://people.tcd.ie/drichard | |
dc.identifier.rssinternalid | 267609 | |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/capr.12771 | |
dc.rights.ecaccessrights | openAccess | |
dc.identifier.orcid_id | 0000-0003-0871-4078 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2262/108752 | |