dc.identifier.citation | Artiles C E., Donnellan C., Regan J, Mooney M., Dysphagia Screening in Residential Long Term Care Settings in the Republic of Ireland: A Cross Sectional Survey, Dysphagia, 2024, 1-12 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Dysphagia is a common health concern reported to affect between 15% [1] and
70% [2] of older adults living in residential long-term care settings (RLTCS), who
constitute a heterogeneous group with different dysphagia-associated conditions
and care needs [3]. Dysphagia may lead to choking, aspiration and aspiration
pneumonia due to impaired deglutition safety, and weight loss, malnutrition and
dehydration as a result of impaired swallowing efficiency if not identified promptly
and adequately managed [4]. Most of the available literature on dysphagia
screening refers to patients with acute stroke, with current evidence supporting
routine administration of swallow screening tests in this population [5]. However,
no clinical guideline has been developed to date for use with older adults with
dysphagia living in RLTCS and there is limited empirical evidence to guide
practices in relation to dysphagia identification and management in this healthcare
setting [3, 6]. In these circumstances, dysphagia screening may occur in an ad hoc
fashion depending on the resources available and healthcare setting [7].
Dysphagia screening is a procedure used to identify individuals at risk of dysphagia
requiring further assessment, involving administration of swallow screening tests,
review of medical history to identify risk factors and conditions known to cause
dysphagia, such as dementia or Parkinson’s disease, and observation of the
presence of signs and symptoms of dysphagia at mealtimes [8, 9]. Further
assessment of swallowing function is indicated in the event of a failed swallow
screen or if dysphagia is suspected [10]. Non-instrumental clinical assessment is
a systematic procedure, conducted by speech and language therapists (SLTs) in
the Republic of Ireland [11], that involves the integration of information from the
individual’s medical history, patient report, oro-facial examination and swallow
trials [10]. This assessment allows to estimate the risk of aspiration, to inform
dysphagia management recommendations and to identify the need for
instrumental assessment [8, 10]. Instrumental swallowing assessment, typically
videofluoroscopic swallowing study or flexible endoscopic evaluation of
swallowing, may be indicated to evaluate the anatomy of the structures involved in swallowing and the physiology of swallowing to obtain a diagnosis of dysphagia
and establish its cause and severity, and determine the underlying cause of
aspiration or residue and presence of silent aspiration [8].
Nursing-led dysphagia screening does not replace SLT assessment; instead, it
allows for early recognition of at-risk individuals and intervention [12]. It is
recommended that all older adults are screened for dysphagia or assessed for
swallowing difficulties on admission to a RLTCS [3, 13]. Swallow screening tests,
such as the Gugging Swallowing Screen [14] or the Volume-Viscosity Swallowing
Test [15], have been validated for use in older adults and recommended in RLTCS
to screen for dysphagia associated signs and symptoms [16]. However, the Yale
Swallow Protocol is the only swallow screening test validated to date for use in
post-acute care to date, including older adults living in RLTCS [17]. Studies
conducted in other countries found that nurses practising in RLTCS rely on
residents’ self-reports of swallowing difficulties [18, 19], observation of signs of
dysphagia during mealtimes [16, 19, 20] or relevant past medical history and
associated risk-factors [16, 18] to identify residents at risk of dysphagia. The
administration of swallow screening tests by nurses is not common practice in
RLTCS [21].
Nursing personnel with 24-hour care access to residents in RLTCS are usually the
first healthcare professionals to observe for signs and symptoms of swallowing
difficulties when assisting with diet and fluid intake. Subsequently, they are often
the healthcare professionals to conduct dysphagia screening and refer patients
with or at risk of dysphagia to the SLT and implement dysphagia management
recommendations [21, 22]. Although it is recommended that residents with
suspected dysphagia be referred to the SLT for a clinical assessment of dysphagia
[23], SLTs may not be readily available in Irish RLTCS [24, 25]. A survey conducted
in the Republic of Ireland found that most Irish RLTCS do not have a SLT onsite
and few nurses have received training on how to administer swallow screening
tests in RLTCS [24]. Given potential delays in accessing SLT dysphagia services
in Irish RLTCS, nurses may implement dysphagia management interventions while
waiting for SLT assessment, including initiation or change of modified diets and modified fluids to reduce the risk of aspiration [25]. Current available evidence
shows that modified texture diets and fluids contribute to undernutrition and
dehydration while not reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonia in older adults with
dysphagia [25, 26].
No previous studies have investigated nursing-led dysphagia screening practices
in RLTCS in the Republic of Ireland. Furthermore, there are no data available on
the prevalence of dysphagia or on the incidence rates of aspiration pneumonia
Irish RLTCS. This study aimed to describe the process of nursing-led dysphagia
screening in RLTCS in the Republic of Ireland and investigate the need to advance
dysphagia screening and evaluation services in Irish RLTCS. Our objectives were:
1) to identify dysphagia screening practices used by nurses; 2) to describe referral
patterns and dysphagia management interventions implemented with residents in
whom dysphagia is suspected and before a clinical assessment of dysphagia is
performed and estimate maximum waiting time (in days) from referral until SLT
assessment; 3) to quantify the number of residents with dysphagia, episodes of
aspiration pneumonia in the previous twelve months and the number of residents
on modified texture diets and fluids; and 4) to determine differences in waiting time
for SLT assessment, prevalence of dysphagia, twelve-month incidence rate of
aspiration pneumonia and use of modified texture diets and fluids between groups
of RLTCS, specifically SLT access (onsite/offsite), administration of swallow
screening tests (yes/no), location (urban/rural) and type of RLTCS
(public/voluntary/private). | en |