Re-evaluating the supposed 'clash' between Islamic law and international human rights Law : the impact of God as a nation's public morality
Citation:
Ahmed Balto, 'Re-evaluating the supposed 'clash' between Islamic law and international human rights Law : the impact of God as a nation's public morality', [thesis], Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland). School of Law, 2017, pp 237, pp 223Download Item:
Abstract:
This thesis examines the relationship between international human rights law and Islamic law in respect to how each ideology deals with human rights. Although it will be contended that God is fundamental in the construction of Islamic public morality, this thesis presents an argument that societies have different public moralities and that international human rights law can and textually does accommodate this variance. The thesis will conclude that there is no fundamental difference between Islamic law and international human rights law. The latter can therefore accommodate the former, and the proposition that Islamic law is inherently incompatible with international human rights law is neither fair nor factual.
Author: Balto, Ahmed
Advisor:
Cox, NevillePublisher:
Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland). School of LawNote:
TARA (Trinity’s Access to Research Archive) has a robust takedown policy. Please contact us if you have any concerns: rssadmin@tcd.ieType of material:
thesisAvailability:
Full text availableSubject:
Law, Ph.D., Ph.D. Trinity College Dublin, 2017Metadata
Show full item recordThe following license files are associated with this item: