Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLaing, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorWang, Han
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T08:45:50Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T08:45:50Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.date.submitted2025
dc.identifier.citationWang, Han, Governance Mechanisms and Corporate Green Bond Issuances, Trinity College Dublin, School of Business, Business & Administrative Studies, 2025en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionAPPROVEDen
dc.description.abstractTo reorient economies towards climate-resilient trajectories compatible with the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius, vast amounts of capital are needed to be directed towards environmental-friendly projects. As major economic players at the forefront of green transitions, corporations may adapt to climate change via financing innovations, such as issuing green bonds to fund investments which exclusively provide environmental benefits. Corporate green bond issuances can be viewed as an environmentally responsible practice, broadly speaking, corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Tang & Zhang, 2020) and a financing strategy (Flammer, 2021). Given the rich literature in corporate finance on the determinants of CSR activities (e.g., Cronqvist & Yu, 2017; Harjoto et al., 2015; McGuinness et al., 2017) and debt choices (e.g., Boubaker et al, 2018; Chen et al, 2020; Lin et al, 2013), a focus on the determinants of corporate green bond decisions from the perspectives of multiple governance mechanisms would be valuable to motivate more corporate issuers into climate adaptations. The main aim of this thesis is to investigate the role of corporate governance mechanisms in incentivizing corporations to issue green bonds. Specifically, I explore the impact of governance quality, board CSR orientation, and firm network characteristics on the proclivity of corporate green bond issuances and on the divergences in post-issue performances across bond types for the first two essays and within the subset of green bonds for the third essay. The first essay demonstrates that governance quality plays a key role in the decision-making process of bond issuances. In a cross-country setting, the empirical evidence reveals that the strong internal governance (managerial entrenchment) has a positive (negative) effect on the proclivity of corporate green bond issuances, ultimately leading to an increase in firm value and a decrease in yield spreads. Such an effect is more pronounced for information- asymmetric and financially distressed firms with greater environmental initiatives. Country-level governance, also known as external governance, is also a significant determinant of the propensity of a firm to issue green bonds,through which it influences investor demands for green bonds. Additional ownership analysis suggests that corporate preferences for green bonds vary in types of shareholders. The study sheds light on governance quality, which may act as a complementary mechanism to the disciplinary effect of the 'green' label in promoting value-enhancing practices. The second essay examines the effect of board CSR orientation on corporate green bond decisions and the post-issuance performances in a multinational sample of firms. Drawing from agency and resource dependence theories, I find that firms with greater CSR orientation are more likely to issue green bonds vis-à-vis conventional ones. Additionally, these firms tend to allocate a larger proportion of funding through green bonds, collectively affect the issuer’s both short-run and long-run value creation and relative issuance costs associated with green bonds as opposed to conventional bonds. The positive effect on the proclivity of green bonds is stronger for firms with greater information asymmetry, and those in countries with higher levels of institutional development and regulatory support for sustainability. The third essay examines whether the practice of issuing green bonds spreads across green issuers via shared executive directors and non-executive directors in Northern America and Europe. Deriving the informational role of firm networks from the resource dependency theory and social capital theory, the empirical evidence documents that issuers who have interlocks with previous green bond issuers (referred to as green interlock) and better green centrality positions, i.e., greater connectedness with prior green bond issuers, are more inclined to start issuing green bonds. The observed positive relation is particularly pronounced for issuers connected with prior issuers with strong CSR commitments and complexity. The wealth generation and issuance cost mitigation effects associated with better-connected green bond issuers as opposed to those with lower green connectedness further demonstrate that the issuance of green bonds can be a value-enhancing and cost-efficient practice for green issuers with effective information transmissions via green interlocks. With contributions to multi-theoretical perspectives under the substitution and/or complementary, agency, resource-dependence, and social capital theories, this thesis relates to the literature on corporate governance, CSR, bond choices and firm networks, and more importantly, contributes to the green bond research from the perspectives of (i) the motivations of corporate green bond issuances by highlighting the key role of corporate governance quality, board CSR orientation and firm networks in driving corporate green bond decisions; (ii) the factors that influence the cost of green bond financings and the yield differentials between green bonds and conventional twins in the primary market by providing evidence that firms with better internal governance and board CSR orientation can lower the issuance costs when issuing green bonds as opposed to conventional counterparts, and firms with interlocks or located central within the network of prior green bond issuers can mitigate the cost of green bond financings; (iii) the sources of the differences in the firm value generated by bond type - the differences in the equity wealth at offer announcements between green and conventional bonds are positively related to board CSR orientation, and well-governed firms can display greater CARs and Tobin’s Q by issuing green bonds than issue conventional bond counterparts; (iv) the factors affecting the differences in equity wealth within the subset of green bonds – interlocks and strong connections with prior green bond issuers appear to be positively associated with CARs.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTrinity College Dublin. School of Business. Discipline of Business & Administrative Studiesen
dc.rightsYen
dc.titleGovernance Mechanisms and Corporate Green Bond Issuancesen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.supercollectionthesis_dissertationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)en
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttps://tcdlocalportal.tcd.ie/pls/EnterApex/f?p=800:71:0::::P71_USERNAME:HWANG1en
dc.identifier.rssinternalid274066en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsembargoedAccess
dc.date.ecembargoEndDate2027-02-10
dc.rights.EmbargoedAccessYen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2262/110809


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record