Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPreda, Adina
dc.contributor.editorJesse Tomalty and Keri Woodsen
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T11:46:49Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T11:46:49Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.submitted2025en
dc.identifier.citationHuman rights and equality, Jesse Tomalty and Keri Woods, Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Human Rights, 2025, Adina Predaen
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.descriptionIN_PRESSen
dc.description.abstractHuman rights are often thought to express an egalitarian idea. This chapter argues that the connection between human rights and equality is more tenuous than it first seems and a robust egalitarianism is neither the input nor the output of human rights, as currently conceived. Inasmuch as human rights might be thought to rest on a substantive notion of moral equality between human beings, this is not supported by strong arguments or existing philosophical justifications for moral human rights. Inasmuch as they may be thought to lead to a form of equality of condition, current philosophical justifications cannot support a genuinely egalitarian, rather than sufficientarian or prioritarian, distribution.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsYen
dc.titleHuman rights and equalityen
dc.title.alternativeRoutledge Handbook of Philosophy of Human Rightsen
dc.typeBook Chapteren
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/predaa
dc.identifier.rssinternalid265146
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagPolitical Philosophyen
dc.identifier.rssurihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josp.12463
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-5372-3961
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Council (ERC)en
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber819043en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2262/111229


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record