Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorConnolly, Deirdreen
dc.contributor.authorKarkon, Shalalehen
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-31T07:14:51Z
dc.date.available2025-03-31T07:14:51Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.date.submitted2025en
dc.identifier.citationKarkon, Shalaleh, A Comparative Evaluation of Two Delivery Methods for a Work Focused Fatigue Management Intervention for Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis, Trinity College Dublin, School of Medicine, Occupational Therapy, 2025en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionAPPROVEDen
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background: Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) often leads to early work disability, impacting employment and causing socio-economic challenges. Fatigue is a major symptom that affects productivity and increases absenteeism. In Ireland, individuals with IA prefer peer-supported, group-based rehabilitation interventions. The Fatigue Management Education for Work (FAME-W) was developed to meet this need as an in-person group programme. However, due to COVID-19, it was adapted to an online format, and a self-guided workbook was introduced. Methodology: FAME-W's development followed the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, ensuring a theoretical foundation and a focus on IA needs. The research aimed to test feasibility and compare delivery methods: an online group-based format and a self-guided workbook. Three studies were conducted: a feasibility study using a comparative randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative components; a multisite comparative RCT to evaluate the impact on work performance; and a mixed methods process evaluation assessing implementation, focusing on fidelity, reach, dose, mechanisms of impact, and context. Results: The feasibility study found both formats acceptable and feasible. Improvements in symptom management and work ability indicated potential for a larger trial. In the comparative RCT, neither format showed statistically significant differences between groups for work performance, fatigue, pain, or quality of life, though slight within-group improvements were seen. The process evaluation highlighted the online format’s interactivity and peer support, while the workbook provided flexibility for self-paced learning. Both methods aided self-management of IA-related fatigue. Conclusion: Both delivery methods effectively support IA symptom management and work performance, warranting further large-scale research to refine intervention strategies.en
dc.publisherTrinity College Dublin. School of Medicine. Discipline of Occupational Therapyen
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectFatifueen
dc.subjectPainen
dc.subjectMental well-beingen
dc.subjectWorken
dc.subjectEmploymenten
dc.subjectSelf-managementen
dc.subjectNon-pharmaceuticalen
dc.subjectInterventionen
dc.subjectTelehealthen
dc.subjectOnline interventionen
dc.subjectInflammatory arthritisen
dc.subjectWork-related fatigueen
dc.subjectWork participationen
dc.subjectGoal settingen
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyen
dc.subjectArthritis and employmenten
dc.subjectWork-focused interventionen
dc.subjectDigital healthen
dc.titleA Comparative Evaluation of Two Delivery Methods for a Work Focused Fatigue Management Intervention for Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritisen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.supercollectionthesis_dissertationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttps://tcdlocalportal.tcd.ie/pls/EnterApex/f?p=800:71:0::::P71_USERNAME:KARKONSen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid276711en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2262/111441


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record