dc.contributor.advisor | Connolly, Deirdre | en |
dc.contributor.author | Karkon, Shalaleh | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-31T07:14:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-31T07:14:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | en |
dc.date.submitted | 2025 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Karkon, Shalaleh, A Comparative Evaluation of Two Delivery Methods for a Work Focused Fatigue Management Intervention for Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis, Trinity College Dublin, School of Medicine, Occupational Therapy, 2025 | en |
dc.identifier.other | Y | en |
dc.description | APPROVED | en |
dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT
Background:
Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) often leads to early work disability, impacting employment and causing socio-economic challenges. Fatigue is a major symptom that affects productivity and increases absenteeism. In Ireland, individuals with IA prefer peer-supported, group-based rehabilitation interventions. The Fatigue Management Education for Work (FAME-W) was developed to meet this need as an in-person group programme. However, due to COVID-19, it was adapted to an online format, and a self-guided workbook was introduced.
Methodology:
FAME-W's development followed the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, ensuring a theoretical foundation and a focus on IA needs. The research aimed to test feasibility and compare delivery methods: an online group-based format and a self-guided workbook. Three studies were conducted: a feasibility study using a comparative randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative components; a multisite comparative RCT to evaluate the impact on work performance; and a mixed methods process evaluation assessing implementation, focusing on fidelity, reach, dose, mechanisms of impact, and context.
Results:
The feasibility study found both formats acceptable and feasible. Improvements in symptom management and work ability indicated potential for a larger trial. In the comparative RCT, neither format showed statistically significant differences between groups for work performance, fatigue, pain, or quality of life, though slight within-group improvements were seen. The process evaluation highlighted the online format’s interactivity and peer support, while the workbook provided flexibility for self-paced learning. Both methods aided self-management of IA-related fatigue.
Conclusion:
Both delivery methods effectively support IA symptom management and work performance, warranting further large-scale research to refine intervention strategies. | en |
dc.publisher | Trinity College Dublin. School of Medicine. Discipline of Occupational Therapy | en |
dc.rights | Y | en |
dc.subject | Fatifue | en |
dc.subject | Pain | en |
dc.subject | Mental well-being | en |
dc.subject | Work | en |
dc.subject | Employment | en |
dc.subject | Self-management | en |
dc.subject | Non-pharmaceutical | en |
dc.subject | Intervention | en |
dc.subject | Telehealth | en |
dc.subject | Online intervention | en |
dc.subject | Inflammatory arthritis | en |
dc.subject | Work-related fatigue | en |
dc.subject | Work participation | en |
dc.subject | Goal setting | en |
dc.subject | Self-efficacy | en |
dc.subject | Arthritis and employment | en |
dc.subject | Work-focused intervention | en |
dc.subject | Digital health | en |
dc.title | A Comparative Evaluation of Two Delivery Methods for a Work Focused Fatigue Management Intervention for Individuals with Inflammatory Arthritis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
dc.type.supercollection | thesis_dissertations | en |
dc.type.supercollection | refereed_publications | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurl | https://tcdlocalportal.tcd.ie/pls/EnterApex/f?p=800:71:0::::P71_USERNAME:KARKONS | en |
dc.identifier.rssinternalid | 276711 | en |
dc.rights.ecaccessrights | openAccess | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2262/111441 | |