dc.contributor.author | Collier, Marcus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-27T09:12:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-27T09:12:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2025 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | O Donnell, M.; Collier, M.J.; Pineda-Pinto, M.; Cooper, C.; Nulty, F. & Rodriguez Castaneda, N., Redefining co-design for social-ecological research and practice: A systematic literature review, Environmental Science and Policy, 164, 2025, 103998 | en |
dc.identifier.other | Y | |
dc.description.abstract | Collaborative processes such as co-design are increasingly crucial in generating social-ecological research and
practice. Fostering change within complex adaptive systems requires collaboratively working with real-world
actors or stakeholders to resolve complicated issues. Co-design is a distinct and fundamental component of
the co-paradigm, a collective term for co-design, co-production, and co-creation. However, scientific literature
currently provides limited definitions of the key concepts within the co-paradigm, leading to misinterpretations
or inconsistent usage. Improving the clarity of these definitions is essential because it permits scientific progress
and better implementation of processes and engagement in practice. To address this gap, the following paper
presents research which critically examines the practice of co-design through a systematic literature review.
Using a systematic approach, this study identifies fifty-two papers with empirical methodologies, which are
thematically analysed to understand the purpose and process of the co-design approach within social-ecological
research and practice. The paper identifies effective co-design methods and discusses the implications of their
utilisation within social-ecological study and practice. The review also identifies and examines definitions of co-
design and the challenges of implementing a co-design approach, highlighting potential solutions. The paper
concludes by proposing an integrative definition of co-design to further understand and enhance the process’s
implementation within social-ecological systems. The definition proposed in this paper can serve as a roadmap
for researchers and practitioners aiming to use co-design as part of sustainable transformation efforts in social-
ecological systems. | en |
dc.format.extent | 103998 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Environmental Science and Policy; | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 164; | |
dc.rights | Y | en |
dc.subject | Co-design, Collaborative research, Co-paradigm, Social-ecological systems, Systematic review, Systems transformation | en |
dc.title | Redefining co-design for social-ecological research and practice: A systematic literature review | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.type.supercollection | scholarly_publications | en |
dc.type.supercollection | refereed_publications | en |
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurl | http://people.tcd.ie/colliema | |
dc.identifier.rssinternalid | 278233 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103998 | |
dc.rights.ecaccessrights | openAccess | |
dc.subject.TCDTheme | Inclusive Society | en |
dc.subject.TCDTheme | Smart & Sustainable Planet | en |
dc.subject.TCDTag | Co-design | en |
dc.subject.TCDTag | NOVEL ECOSYSTEMS | en |
dc.subject.TCDTag | co-creation | en |
dc.subject.TCDTag | systematic reviews | en |
dc.identifier.rssuri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000140?via%3Dihub | |
dc.identifier.orcid_id | 0000-0002-6853-9980 | |
dc.subject.darat_thematic | Attitudes | en |
dc.subject.darat_thematic | Environment and housing | en |
dc.subject.darat_thematic | Literature | en |
dc.subject.darat_thematic | Social participation | en |
dc.status.accessible | N | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) | en |
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber | 13/RC/2106_P2 | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | European Research Council (ERC) | en |
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber | 101002440 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2262/111854 | |