dc.contributor.author | McHugh, Deirdre | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-08-29T09:42:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-08-29T09:42:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1985 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McHugh, Deirdre. 'Trade, growth and the role of demand - neoclassical and Keynesian explanations of Ireland's post war growth experience: Barrington lecture 1984'. - Dublin: Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland,Vol. XXV No. 2b, 1984/1985, pp221-238 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 00814776 | |
dc.identifier.other | JEL E12 | |
dc.identifier.other | JEL E13 | |
dc.identifier.other | Y | |
dc.description | Read before the Society, 23 May, 1985.
In 1984, the Council of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland established a
competition to select the author of an Annual Barrington Lecture, to replace the former
system of appointment of Barrington Lecturers who delivered lectures in the four
provinces throughout the year. The first prize winning lecture is presented
here. | en |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the nature of the trade growth relationship in post war Ireland. We
consider two major theoretical approaches, the Neoclassical and the Keynesian,
attempting to identify and contrast the key features of each model. The two models differ
noticeably in the importance which they accord to demand constraints and, by corollary,
in the extent to which they subscribe to the small open economy (SOE) model of the
Irish economy.
The structure of the paper is as follows: Section 1 sets the scene for subsequent analysis.
It describes the reorientation of trade policy which took place in the 1950s and shows
how this shift in policy stance coincided with a significant improvement in economic
performance. In Section 2, we introduce the Neoclassical and Keynesian models of
growth and consider the different ways in which they incorporate the role of trade in the
growth process. Sections 3 and 4 focus more directly on the issues raised in the opening
paragraph. It is suggested that
the policy strategies implied by the two models may not differ substantially, although the
policy instruments undoubtedly will. | en |
dc.format.extent | 1038094 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of The Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol. XXV No. 2b 1984/1985 | en |
dc.relation.haspart | Vol. [No.], [Year] | en |
dc.source.uri | http://www.ssisi.ie | |
dc.subject | Irish economic growth | en |
dc.subject | Macroeconomic models | en |
dc.subject | Irish economy | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 314.15 | |
dc.title | Trade, growth and the role of demand - neoclassical and Keynesian explanations of Ireland's post war growth experience | en |
dc.title.alternative | Barrington lecture 1984 | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.status.refereed | Yes | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2262/21441 | |