Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBYRNE, RUTH MARY JOSEPHINE
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-05T15:11:52Z
dc.date.available2010-05-05T15:11:52Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.date.submitted2000en
dc.identifier.citationJohnson-Laird, P.N. & Byrne, R.M.J, Mental models and pragmatics: Author's response, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 2000, 284 - 286en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractVan der Henst argues that the theory of mental models lacks a pragmatic component. He fills the gap with the notion that reasoners draw the most relevant conclusions. We agree, but argue that theories need an element of ?nondeterminism.? It is often impossible to predict either what will be most relevant or which particular conclusion an individual will draw.en
dc.format.extent284en
dc.format.extent286en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBehavioral and Brain Sciences;
dc.relation.ispartofseries23;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleMental models and pragmatics: Author's responseen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/rmbyrne
dc.identifier.rssinternalid12432
dc.identifier.rssurihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00222449en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/39384


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record