Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrendergast, Canice
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-08T14:34:59Z
dc.date.available2011-08-08T14:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationPrendergast, Canice. 'What have we learnt about pay for performance?'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, Summer, 2011, pp113-134, Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
dc.identifier.issn0012-9984
dc.identifier.otherJEL G38
dc.identifier.otherJEL D04
dc.identifier.otherJEL G34
dc.descriptionGeary Lecture Winter 2010
dc.description.abstractGovernance is a central concern of economics. In much of economic activity, relevant principals (firms, voters, government agencies, and so on) delegate decisions to agents who may not have the interests of those principals at heart. Much of the literature in microeconomics of the last two decades has been concerned with the issue ? what mechanisms can firms use to attempt to align interests? That such concerns are important hardly needs to be emphasised in the current Irish economic environment, where concerns of excessive lending by the banking sector have resulted in many claims about compensation and oversight. The purpose of this lecture is to overview the literature on one mechanism that has been proposed for solving agency concerns ? pay for performance ? but to place it in the context of other forms of governance.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEconomic & Social Studies
dc.relation.ispartofVol.XX, No. XX, Issue, Year
dc.sourceEconomic & Social Reviewen
dc.subjectMicroeconomicsen
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen
dc.subjectPerformance evaluationen
dc.titleWhat have we learnt about pay for performance?
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.publisher.placeDublinen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/58416


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record