Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThom, Rodney
dc.contributor.authorBrowne, F. X.
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-19T09:08:02Z
dc.date.available2012-07-19T09:08:02Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.citationThom, Rodney. 'Interest and non-interest terms in the process of mortgage market clearing: a rejoinder'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, April, 1990, p. 335. Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
dc.identifier.issn0012-9984
dc.identifier.otherJEL G21
dc.identifier.otherJEL R31
dc.description.abstractIn his reply to my comment Browne claims that the failure of variations in the downpayment ratio to shift market demand "is no more than a mere hypothesis which does not ,..., possess much apriori appeal." The bases of my argument is twofold. First, market demand is simply the horizontal aggregation of individual demands. Second, when individuals cannot secure their desired demand at the prevailing price there is no reason to assume that they will automatically exit from the market. If these are unappealing hypotheses then we require a drastic rewriting of basic microeconomic texts.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEconomic & Social Studies
dc.sourceEconomic & Social Reviewen
dc.subjectInterest ratesen
dc.subjectMortgage marketen
dc.subjectIrelanden
dc.subjectMortgagesen
dc.titleInterest and non-interest terms in the process of mortgage market clearing: a rejoinder
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.publisher.placeDublinen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/64316


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record