dc.contributor.author | Leahy, Dermot | |
dc.contributor.author | Neary, J. Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-04T09:12:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-04T09:12:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Leahy, Dermot; Neary, J. Peter. 'Time consistency, learning by doing and infant-industry protection: The linear case'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, October, 1994, pp. 59-68, Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0012-9984 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the implications for strategic trade policy of diiferent assumptions about precommitment in a dynamic oligopoly game with learning by doing. Assuming that demands are linear, we find that the optimal first-period subsidy is increasing in the rate of learning with precommitment but decreasing in it if the government cannot precommit to future subsidies. The infant-industry argument is thus reversed in the absence of precommitment. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Economic & Social Studies | |
dc.source | Economic & Social Review | en |
dc.subject | Trade policy | en |
dc.subject | Infant-industry | en |
dc.subject | Learning | en |
dc.title | Time consistency, learning by doing and infant-industry protection: The linear case | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.publisher.place | Dublin | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2262/64848 | |