Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeahy, Dermot
dc.contributor.authorNeary, J. Peter
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-04T09:12:55Z
dc.date.available2012-09-04T09:12:55Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.citationLeahy, Dermot; Neary, J. Peter. 'Time consistency, learning by doing and infant-industry protection: The linear case'. - Economic & Social Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, October, 1994, pp. 59-68, Dublin: Economic & Social Research Institute
dc.identifier.issn0012-9984
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the implications for strategic trade policy of diiferent assumptions about precommitment in a dynamic oligopoly game with learning by doing. Assuming that demands are linear, we find that the optimal first-period subsidy is increasing in the rate of learning with precommitment but decreasing in it if the government cannot precommit to future subsidies. The infant-industry argument is thus reversed in the absence of precommitment.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEconomic & Social Studies
dc.sourceEconomic & Social Reviewen
dc.subjectTrade policyen
dc.subjectInfant-industryen
dc.subjectLearningen
dc.titleTime consistency, learning by doing and infant-industry protection: The linear case
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.publisher.placeDublinen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/64848


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record