Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGOBL, CHRISTERen
dc.contributor.authorNI CHASAIDE, AILBHEen
dc.contributor.authorYANUSHEVSKAYA, IRENAen
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T15:41:26Z
dc.date.available2014-12-01T15:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.date.submitted2013en
dc.identifier.citationYanushevskaya I., Gobl C., Ní Chasaide A., Voice quality in affect cueing: does loudness matter?, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 335, 2013, 1 - 14en
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractIn emotional speech research, it has been suggested that loudness, along with other prosodic features, may be an important cue in communicating high activation affects. In earlier studies, we found different voice quality stimuli to be consistently associated with certain affective states. In these stimuli, as in typical human productions, the different voice qualities entailed differences in loudness. To examine the extent to which the loudness differences among these voice qualities might influence the affective coloring they impart, two experiments were conducted with the synthesized stimuli, in which loudness was systematically manipulated. Experiment 1 used stimuli with distinct voice quality features including intrinsic loudness variations and stimuli where voice quality (modal voice) was kept constant, but loudness was modified to match the non-modal qualities. If loudness is the principal determinant in affect cueing for different voice qualities, there should be little or no difference in the responses to the two sets of stimuli. In Experiment 2, the stimuli included distinct voice quality features but all had equal loudness to test the hypothesis that equalizing the perceived loudness of different voice quality stimuli will have relatively little impact on affective ratings. The results suggest that loudness variation on its own is relatively ineffective whereas variation in voice quality is essential to the expression of affect. In Experiment 1, stimuli incorporating distinct voice quality features consistently obtained higher ratings than the modal voice stimuli with varied loudness. In Experiment 2, non-modal voice quality stimuli proved potent in affect cueing even with loudness differences equalized. Although loudness per se does not seem to be the major determinant of perceived affect, it can contribute positively to affect cueing: when combined with a tense or modal voice quality, increased loudness can enhance signaling of high activation states.en
dc.format.extent1en
dc.format.extent14en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Psychologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries4en
dc.relation.ispartofseries335en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectVoice Qualityen
dc.titleVoice quality in affect cueing: does loudness matter?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/yanushien
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/anichsiden
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/cegoblen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid87168en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00335en
dc.relation.ecprojectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/507422
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeDigital Humanitiesen
dc.subject.TCDThemeIntelligent Content & Communicationsen
dc.subject.TCDThemeMaking Irelanden
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Union (EU)en
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber507422en
dc.contributor.sponsorScience Foundation Ireland (SFI)en
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber09/IN.1/I2631en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/72339


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record