Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKELLY, DANIELen
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-05T10:15:33Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05T10:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.date.submitted2014en
dc.identifier.citationSteward AJ, Wagner DR, Kelly DJ, Exploring the roles of integrin binding and cytoskeletal reorganization during mesenchymal stem cell mechanotransduction in soft and stiff hydrogels subjected to dynamic compression., Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 38, 2014, 174-82en
dc.identifier.issn1878-0180en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to explore how the response of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to dynamic compression (DC) depends on their pericellular environment and the development of their cytoskeleton. MSCs were first seeded into 3% agarose hydrogels, stimulated with the chondrogenic growth factor TGF-β3 and exposed to DC (~10% strain at 1Hz) for 1h on either day 7, 14, or 21 of culture. At each time point, the actin, vimentin and tubulin networks of the MSCs were assessed using confocal microscopy. Similar to previous results, MSCs displayed a temporal response to DC; however, no dramatic changes in gross cytoskeletal organization were observed with time in culture. Vinculin (a membrane-cytoskeletal protein in focal adhesions) staining appeared more intense with time in culture. We next aimed to explore how changes to the pericellular environment, independent of the duration of exposure to TGF-β3, would influence the response of MSCs to DC. To this end, MSCs were encapsulated into either 'soft' or 'stiff' agarose hydrogels that are known to differentially support pericellular matrix (PCM) development. The application of DC led to greater relative increases in the expression of chondrogenic marker genes in the stiffer hydrogels, where the MSCs were found to have a more well developed PCM. These increases in gene expression were not observed following the addition of RGDS, an integrin blocker, suggesting that integrin binding plays a role in determining the response of MSCs to DC. Microtubule organization in MSCs was found to adapt in response to DC, but this effect was not integrin mediated, as this cytoskeletal reorganization was also observed in the presence of RGDS. In conclusion, although the PCM, integrin binding, and cytoskeletal reorganization are all involved in mechanotransduction of DC, none of these factors in isolation was able to completely explain the temporal mechanosensitivity of MSCs to dynamic compressionen
dc.format.extent174-82en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materialsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries38en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectCytoskeleton; Focal adhesion; Mechanobiology; Mechanotransduction; Mesenchymal; Pericellular matrixen
dc.subjectPericellular matrixen
dc.subjectMesenchymalen
dc.subjectMechanotransductionen
dc.subjectMechanobiologyen
dc.subjectFocal adhesionen
dc.subjectCytoskeletonen
dc.titleExploring the roles of integrin binding and cytoskeletal reorganization during mesenchymal stem cell mechanotransduction in soft and stiff hydrogels subjected to dynamic compression.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/kellyd9en
dc.identifier.rssinternalid98468en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.020en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeNext Generation Medical Devicesen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-4091-0992en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/72874


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record