Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorREILLY, RICHARDen
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-17T10:13:43Z
dc.date.available2015-04-17T10:13:43Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.date.submitted2014en
dc.identifier.citationD'Arcy, S. MacHale, E. Seheult, J. Holmes, M.S. Hughes, C. Sulaiman, I. Hyland, D. O'Reilly, C. Glynn, S. Al-Zaabi, T. McCourt, J. Taylor, T. Keane, F. Killane, I. Reilly, R.B. Costello, R.W., A method to assess adherence in inhaler use through analysis of acoustic recordings of inhaler events, Plos One, 9, 6, 2014, 009870-en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractRationale Poor adherence to inhaler use can be due to poor temporal and/or technique adherence. Up until now there has been no way of reliably tracking both these factors in everyday inhaler use. Objectives This paper introduces a device developed to create time stamped acoustic recordings of an individual's inhaler use, in which empirical evidence of temporal and technique adherence in inhaler use can be monitored over time. The correlation between clinical outcomes and adherence, as determined by this device, was compared for temporal adherence alone and combined temporal and technique adherence. Findings The technology was validated by showing that the doses taken matched the number of audio recordings (r2 = 0.94, p<0.01). To demonstrate that audio analysis of inhaler use gives objective information, in vitro studies were performed. These showed that acoustic profiles of inhalations correlated with the peak inspiratory flow rate (r2 = 0.97, p<0.01), and that the acoustic energy of exhalations into the inhaler was related to the amount of drug removed. Despite training, 16% of participants exhaled into the mouthpiece after priming, in >20% of their inhaler events. Repeated training reduced this to 7% of participants (p = 0.03). When time of use was considered, there was no evidence of a relationship between adherence and changes in AQLQ (r2 = 0.2) or PEFR (r2 = 0.2). Combining time and technique the rate of adherence was related to changes in AQLQ (r2 = 0.53, p = 0.01) and PEFR (r2 = 0.29, p = 0.01). Conclusions This study presents a novel method to objectively assess how errors in both time and technique of inhaler use impact on clinical outcomes.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was funded by the Health Research Board in Ireland, www.HRB.ie. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscripten
dc.format.extent009870en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPlos Oneen
dc.relation.ispartofseries9en
dc.relation.ispartofseries6en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectinhaleren
dc.subject.lcshinhaleren
dc.titleA method to assess adherence in inhaler use through analysis of acoustic recordings of inhaler eventsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/reillyrien
dc.identifier.rssinternalid102336en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098701en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.rssurihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84902595589&partnerID=40&md5=5b04aad5a672bf535ea29fb19bd0fa85en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/73777


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record