Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWHITE, ARTHURen
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-12T13:54:10Z
dc.date.available2016-08-12T13:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.date.submitted2016en
dc.identifier.citationRyan, D.F., Dominique, M., Seaton, D., Stegen, K., and White, A., The effects of Flare Definitions on the Statistics of Derived Flare Distributions., Astronomy & Astrophysics, 592, A133, 2016, 1-14en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractThe statistical examination of solar flares is crucial to revealing their global characteristics and behaviour. Such examinations can tackle large-scale science questions or give context to detailed single-event studies. However, they are often performed using standard but basic flare detection algorithms relying on arbitrary thresholds. This arbitrariness may lead to important scientific conclusions being drawn from results caused by subjective choices in algorithms rather than the true nature of the Sun. In this paper, we explore the effect of the arbitrary thresholds used in the GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) event list and LYRA (Large Yield RAdiometer) Flare Finder algorithms. We find that there is a small but significant relationship between the power law exponent of the GOES flare peak flux frequency distribution and the flare start thresholds of the algorithms. We also find that the power law exponents of these distributions are not stable, but appear to steepen with increasing peak flux. This implies that the observed flare size distribution may not be a power law at all. We show that depending on the true value of the exponent of the flare size distribution, this deviation from a power law may be due to flares missed by the flare detection algorithms. However, it is not possible determine the true exponent from GOES/XRS observations. Additionally we find that the PROBA2/LYRA flare size distributions are artificially steep and clearly non-power law. We show that this is consistent with an insufficient degradation correction. This means that PROBA2/LYRA should not be used for flare statistics or energetics unless degradation is adequately accounted for. However, it can be used to study variations over shorter timescales and for space weather monitoring.en
dc.format.extent1-14en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAstronomy & Astrophysicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries592en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesA133en
dc.rightsYen
dc.titleThe effects of Flare Definitions on the Statistics of Derived Flare Distributions.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/arwhiteen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid121997en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628130en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagASTROPHYSICSen
dc.subject.TCDTagApplied Statisticsen
dc.subject.TCDTagPARETO POWER LAWen
dc.subject.TCDTagPOWER LAWen
dc.subject.TCDTagPOWER-LAW DISTRIBUTIONSen
dc.subject.TCDTagSolar Physicsen
dc.subject.TCDTagStatisticsen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-7268-5163en
dc.contributor.sponsorSFI stipenden
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber08/IN.1/I1879en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/76840


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record