Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDarker, Catherine
dc.contributor.advisorBarry, Joe
dc.contributor.authorWHISTON, LUCY ANN
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T16:14:31Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T16:14:31Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.date.submitted2019
dc.identifier.citationWHISTON, LUCY ANN, Patient and family participation in healthcare design and delivery in a psychiatry and a type 2 diabetes service, Trinity College Dublin.School of Medicine, 2019en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionAPPROVEDen
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is no consensus on the best way to include patients and family in healthcare design and delivery. This PhD aimed to develop, implement and test the feasibility of an intervention to encourage patient and family participation in an adult outpatient psychiatry service and an adult outpatient type 2 diabetes service. Methods: A mixed methods approach was adopted across five studies. Interviews, focus groups, questionnaires and Delphi Technique Experiments (DTE) were employed. Participants included patients, family members, clinicians and policy leaders. This was guided by the theoretical framework of Arnstein?s Ladder of Participation and the CLEAR Framework. Results: Patient and family participation at the service level is restricted to the provision of information. Typically no involvement in discussions or the decision-making process is reported. However, participants favour greater patient participation (537/669; 80.3%) and family participation (374/676; 55.3%) at the service level. Interventions to encourage greater participation need to; include patients, family members and clinicians in development, link with wider patient and family populations, provide training and support and consider process and structure. The psychiatry pilot intervention was not implemented. This was due to a decision for clinicians to review representative attendance at management meetings after 3 months, linked with fears and anxiety, and a lack of structure in meetings. The diabetes pilot intervention of representative and clinician meetings supported by a forum was feasible with the support of the research team. This led to increases in the intensity of participation, changes in the service and improved communication. Conclusion: This is the first time the intensity and support for greater participation has been identified at the service level in Ireland. It is also the first time consensus has been obtained between patients, family members and clinicians on what participation should look like using a DTE methodology. Services should identify intensity and preferences of participation and provide opportunities for participation. This requires policy with clearly defined goals and objectives relating to participation to be enacted and to include supports for implementation. Going forward there is a necessity for research to focus on outcomes, expand to a broader variety of services and continue work on family member and service level participation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTrinity College Dublin. School of Medicine. Discipline of Public Health & Primary Careen
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectPatient Participationen
dc.subjectFamily Participationen
dc.subjectPublic and Patient Involvementen
dc.subjectDiabetesen
dc.subjectPsychiatryen
dc.subjectMixed methodsen
dc.titlePatient and family participation in healthcare design and delivery in a psychiatry and a type 2 diabetes serviceen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.type.supercollectionthesis_dissertationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttps://tcdlocalportal.tcd.ie/pls/EnterApex/f?p=800:71:0::::P71_USERNAME:WHISTOLen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid209170en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.contributor.sponsorIrish Research Council (IRC)en
dc.contributor.sponsorAdelaide Health Foundationen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/91076


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record