Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'DRISCOLL, LORRAINE
dc.contributor.authorLarkin, Annemarie
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Susan
dc.contributor.authorPurcell, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorMoran, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorCrown, John
dc.contributor.authorParkinson, Michael
dc.contributor.authorClynes, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-13T14:24:36Z
dc.date.available2020-03-13T14:24:36Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.submitted2004en
dc.identifier.citationLarkin, A., O'Driscoll, L., Kennedy, S., Purcell, R., Moran, E., Crown, J., Parkinson, M. & Clynes, M., Investigation of MRP-1 protein and MDR-1 P-glycoprotein expression in invasive breast cancer: a prognostic study, Int. J. Cancer, 112, 2, 2004, 286 - 294en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of breast cancer treatment is limited by the development of resistance to various chemotherapeutic agents. We conducted a retrospective study of the expression of 2 drug resistance efflux pumps, MRP‐1 and MDR‐1 Pgp, in 177 invasive breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemical expression of these proteins was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics as well as relapse‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) times. MDR‐1 Pgp was associated strongly with higher histologic grade (grade III). A highly significant association was shown between MDR‐1 Pgp and MRP‐1 expression (p < 0.01), 47.4% of patients expressing both proteins; MRP‐1 was expressed in approximately 61% of patients and MDR‐1, in approximately 66% of patients. No association was shown in the overall group between either MDR‐1 Pgp or MRP‐1 and any of the other clinicopathologic features. Kaplan‐Meier analysis revealed that in a subset of patients with either high‐grade (grade III) stage 1 (node‐negative) or stage 2 (node‐positive) tumours who were treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, MRP‐1 expression in <25% of tumour cells at diagnosis was significantly associated with improved RFS (p < 0.02) and OS (p < 0.02). Using multivariate analysis, MRP‐1 expression in <25% of tumour cells at diagnosis was identified as an independent, significant prognostic factor for RFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01) in this patient group but not in other groups. In this subgroup, no significant correlation was observed between expression of MDR‐1 Pgp and MRP‐1. While the number of patients with high‐grade tumours treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was small and further confirmatory research is warranted, it appears that assessment of MRP‐1 expression at diagnosis may offer useful prognostic information in subgroups of patients with stage 1 or stage 2 high‐grade tumours who receive CMF‐based adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the known substrate specificities of MRP‐1, any mechanistic relationship between MRP‐1 expression and CMF resistance remains unclear. No association was shown between MDR‐1 Pgp expression and either RFS or OS time in any subgroup of patients.en
dc.format.extent286en
dc.format.extent294en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInt. J. Cancer;
dc.relation.ispartofseries112;
dc.relation.ispartofseries2;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectBreast canceren
dc.subjectMRP-1en
dc.subjectMDR-1en
dc.subjectPgpen
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistryen
dc.subjectPrognosisen
dc.subjectRelapse-free survivalen
dc.subjectOverall survivalen
dc.titleInvestigation of MRP-1 protein and MDR-1 P-glycoprotein expression in invasive breast cancer: a prognostic studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/lodrisc
dc.identifier.rssinternalid54797
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20369
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-9860-8262
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijc.20369
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/91793


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record