Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPorcedda, Mariaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T13:05:45Z
dc.date.available2022-03-21T13:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.date.submitted2018en
dc.identifier.citationMaria Grazia Porcedda, Patching the patchwork: appraising the EU regulatory framework on cyber security breaches, Computer Law & Security Review, 34, 5, 2018, 1077--1098en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractBreaches of security, a.k.a. security and data breaches, are on the rise, one of the reasons being the well-known lack of incentives to secure services and their underlying technologies, such as cloud computing. In this article, I question whether the patchwork of six EU instruments addressing breaches (Framework Directive, e-Privacy Directive, eIDAS Regulation, PSD2, GDPR, NIS Directive) is helping to prevent or mitigate breaches as intended. At a lower level of abstraction, the question concerns appraising the success of each instrument separately. At a higher level of abstraction, since all laws converge on the objective of network and information security – one of the three pillars of the EU cyber security policy – the question is whether the legal ‘patchwork’ is helping to ‘patch’ the underlying insecurity of network and information systems thus contributing to cyber security. To answer the research question, I look at the regulatory framework as a whole, from the perspective of network and information security and consequently I use the expression cyber security breaches. I appraise the regulatory patchwork by using the three goals of notification identified by the European Commission as a benchmark, enriched by policy documents, legal analysis, and academic literature on breaches legislation, and I elaborate my analysis by reasoning on the case of cloud computing. The analysis, which is frustrated by the lack of adequate data, shows that the regulatory framework on cyber security breaches may be failing to provide the necessary level of mutual learning on the functioning of security measures, awareness of both regulatory authorities and the public on how entities fare in protecting data (and the related network and information systems), and enforcing self-improvement of entities dealing with information and services. I conclude with some recommendations addressing the causes, rather than the symptoms, of network and information systems insecurity.en
dc.format.extent1077--1098en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComputer Law & Security Reviewen
dc.relation.ispartofseries34en
dc.relation.ispartofseries5en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectCybersecurityen
dc.subjectData protectionen
dc.subjectCloud computingen
dc.subjectData breachesen
dc.subjectBreaches of securityen
dc.titlePatching the patchwork: appraising the EU regulatory framework on cyber security breachesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/mariagrpen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid208450en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.009en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.identifier.rssurihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364918301201?via%3Dihuben
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-9271-3512en
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/98326


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record