Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaulfield, Brianen
dc.contributor.authorO'Mahony, Margareten
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-12T15:27:57Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T15:27:57Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.date.submitted2024en
dc.identifier.citationPriyan, S., Guo, Y., McNabola, A., Broderick, B., Caulfield, B., O'Mahony, M., Gallagher, J, Detecting and quantifying PM2.5 and NO2 contributions from train and road traffic in the vicinity of a major railway terminal in Dublin, Ireland, Environmental Pollution, 361, 2024, 124903en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractAir pollution from transport hubs is a recognised health concern for local urban inhabitants. Within the domain of transport hubs, significant attention has been given to larger airport and port settings, however concerns have been raised about emissions from urban railway hubs, especially those with diesel trains. This paper presents an approach that adopts low-cost monitoring (LCM) for fixed site monitoring (FSM) to quantify and disaggregate PM2.5 and NO2 contributions from railway station and road traffic on air quality in the vicinity of railway station in Dublin, Ireland. The NO2 sensor showed larger discrepancies than the PM2.5 sensor when compared to the reference monitor. Machine learning models (XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) regression) were applied to calibrate the LCM devices, with the XGBoost model (NO2, R2 = 0.8 and RSME = 9.1 μg/m3 & PM2.5, R2 = 0.92 and RSME = 2.2 μg/m3) deemed more appropriate than the RF model. Local wind conditions, pressure, PM2.5 concentrations, and road traffic significantly impacted NO2 model results, while raw PM2.5 sensor readings greatly influenced the PM2.5 model output. This highlights that the NO2 sensor requires more input data for accurate calibration, unlike the PM2.5 sensor. The monitoring results from the one-month monitoring campaign from 25 May 2023 to 25 June 2023 presented elevated NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations measured at the railway station, which translated to exceedances of the annual WHO limits (PM2.5 = 5 μg/m3, NO2 = 10 μg/m3) by 1.6-1.8 and 3.2-5.2 times respectively at the study site. A subsequent data filtering technique based on wind orientation, revealed that the railway station was the main PM2.5 source and road traffic was the main NO2 source when winds come from the railway station. This study highlights the value of LCM devices alongside robust machine learning techniques to capture air quality in urban settings.en
dc.format.extent124903en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental Pollutionen
dc.relation.ispartofseries361en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectair quality sensors, bivariate polar plot, machine learning, railway station, transport hubsen
dc.titleDetecting and quantifying PM2.5 and NO2 contributions from train and road traffic in the vicinity of a major railway terminal in Dublin, Irelanden
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/caulfiben
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/mmmahonyen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid270596en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124903en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeSmart & Sustainable Planeten
dc.subject.TCDTagEnvironmental aspects of transportationen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-3877-475Xen
dc.subject.darat_thematicTransporten
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2262/109229


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record