Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Dowd, Thomasen
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Susanen
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-01T14:29:22Z
dc.date.available2011-04-01T14:29:22Z
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.date.submitted2011en
dc.identifier.citationSmith SM, Paul G, Kelly A, Whitford DL, O'Shea E, O'Dowd T, Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial., BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, 2011, d715en
dc.identifier.issn0959-535Xen
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled. SETTING: 20 general practices in the east of the Republic of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: 395 patients (192 in intervention group, 203 in control group) and 29 peer supporters with type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: All practices introduced a standardised diabetes care system. The peer support intervention ran over a two year period and contained four elements: the recruitment and training of peer supporters, nine group meetings led by peer supporters in participant's own general practice, and a retention plan for the peer supporters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HbA(1c); cholesterol concentration; systolic blood pressure; and wellbeing score. RESULTS: There was no difference between intervention and control patients at baseline. All practices and 85% (337) of patients were followed up. At two year follow-up, there were no significant differences in HbA(1c) (mean difference -0.08%, 95% confidence interval -0.35% to 0.18%), systolic blood pressure (-3.9 mm Hg, -8.9 to 1.1 mm Hg), total cholesterol concentration (-0.03 mmol/L, -0.28 to 0.22 mmol/L), or wellbeing scores (-0.7, -2.3 to 0.8). While there was a trend towards decreases in the proportion of patients with poorly controlled risk factors at follow-up, particularly for systolic blood pressure (52% (87/166) >130 mm Hg in intervention v 61% (103/169) >130 mm Hg in control), these changes were not significant. The process evaluation indicated that the intervention was generally delivered as intended, though 18% (35) of patients in the intervention group never attended any group meetings. CONCLUSIONS: A group based peer support intervention is feasible in general practice settings, but the intervention was not effective when targeted at all patients with type 2 diabetes. While there was a trend towards improvements of clinical outcomes, the results do not support the widespread adoption of peer support. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42541690.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was fully funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland (Strategic Health Research and Development Research Awards 2004, S/A 009)en
dc.format.extentd715en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMJ (Clinical research ed.)en
dc.relation.ispartofseries342en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectDieteticsen
dc.subjectHealth care sciences and servicesen
dc.subjectDiabetesen
dc.titlePeer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/todowden
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/susmithen
dc.identifier.rssinternalid72378en
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-6820-112Xen
dc.contributor.sponsorHealth Research Board (HRB)en
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumberS/A 009en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/54418


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record