Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRomero-Ortuno, Roman
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T15:16:24Z
dc.date.available2021-05-15T15:16:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2018en
dc.identifier.citationTravers J., Romero-Ortuno R., Bailey J., Cooney M.T., Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions, British Journal of General Practice, 2019 Jan;69(678):e61-e69en
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recommendations for routine frailty screening in general practice are increasing as frailty prevalence grows. In England, frailty identification became a contractual requirement in 2017. However, there is little guidance on the most effective and practical interventions once frailty has been identified. Aim: To assess the comparative effectiveness and ease of implementation of frailty interventions in primary care. Design and setting: A systematic review of frailty interventions in primary care. Method: Scientific databases were searched from inception to May 2017 for randomised controlled trials or cohort studies with control groups on primary care frailty interventions. Screening methods, interventions, and outcomes were analysed in included studies. Effectiveness was scored in terms of change of frailty status or frailty indicators and ease of implementation in terms of human resources, marginal costs, and time requirements. Results: A total of 925 studies satisfied search criteria and 46 were included. There were 15 690 participants (median study size was 160 participants). Studies reflected a broad heterogeneity. There were 17 different frailty screening methods. Of the frailty interventions, 23 involved physical activity and other interventions involved health education, nutrition supplementation, home visits, hormone supplementation, and counselling. A significant improvement of frailty status was demonstrated in 71% (n = 10) of studies and of frailty indicators in 69% (n=22) of studies where measured. Interventions with both muscle strength training and protein supplementation were consistently placed highest for effectiveness and ease of implementation. Conclusion: A combination of muscle strength training and protein supplementation was the most effective intervention to delay or reverse frailty and the easiest to implement in primary care. A map of interventions was created that can be used to inform choices for managing frailty.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBritish Journal of General Practice;
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectcounsellingen
dc.subjectmanaging frailtyen
dc.subjectfrailty prevalence growsen
dc.subjectFeasibilityen
dc.subjectFrailtyen
dc.subjectPrimary careen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen
dc.titleDelaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventionsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/romeroor
dc.identifier.rssinternalid192470
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X700241
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeAgeingen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-3882-7447
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/96315


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record