Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRomero-Ortuno, Romanen
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Silvinen
dc.contributor.authorKenny, Roseen
dc.contributor.authorHern?ndez, Belindaen
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-05T14:16:28Z
dc.date.available2021-11-05T14:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.date.submitted2021en
dc.identifier.citationJames R. Davis, Silvin P. Knight, Orna A. Donoghue, Belinda Hern?ndez, Rossella Rizzo, Rose Anne Kenny, Roman Romero-Ortuno, Comparison of gait speed reserve, usual gait speed, and maximum gait speed of adults aged 50+ in Ireland using explainable machine learning, Frontiers in Network Physiology: Networks in Aging and Frailty, 2021en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractGait speed is a measure of general fitness. Changing from usual (UGS) to maximum (MGS) gait speed requires coordinated action of many body systems. Gait speed reserve (GSR) is defined as MGS–UGS. From a shortlist of 88 features across five categories including sociodemographic, cognitive, and physiological, we aimed to find and compare the sets of predictors that best describe UGS, MGS, and GSR. For this, we leveraged data from 3,925 adults aged 50+ from Wave 3 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Features were selected by a histogram gradient boosting regression-based stepwise feature selection pipeline. Each model’s feature importance and input–output relationships were explored using TreeExplainer from the Shapely Additive Explanations explainable machine learning package. The mean R2adj (SD) from fivefold cross-validation on training data and the R2adj score on test data were 0.38 (0.04) and 0.41 for UGS, 0.45 (0.04) and 0.46 for MGS, and 0.19 (0.02) and 0.21 for GSR. Each model selected features across all categories. Features common to all models were age, grip strength, chair stands time, mean motor reaction time, and height. Exclusive to UGS and MGS were educational attainment, fear of falling, Montreal cognitive assessment errors, and orthostatic intolerance. Exclusive to MGS and GSR were body mass index (BMI), and number of medications. No features were selected exclusively for UGS and GSR. Features unique to UGS were resting-state pulse interval, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) depression, sit-to-stand difference in diastolic blood pressure, and left visual acuity. Unique to MGS were standard deviation in sustained attention to response task times, resting-state heart rate, smoking status, total heartbeat power during paced breathing, and visual acuity. Unique to GSR were accuracy proportion in a sound-induced flash illusion test, Mini-mental State Examination errors, and number of cardiovascular conditions. No interactions were present in the GSR model. The four features that overall gave the most impactful interactions in the UGS and MGS models were age, chair stands time, grip strength, and BMI. These findings may help provide new insights into the multisystem predictors of gait speed and gait speed reserve in older adults and support a network physiology approach to their study.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Network Physiology: Networks in Aging and Frailtyen
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectGaiten
dc.subjectSpeeden
dc.subjectMaximumen
dc.subjectReserveen
dc.subjectExplainableen
dc.subjectGradienten
dc.subjectWalkingen
dc.subjectPhysiologicalen
dc.titleComparison of gait speed reserve, usual gait speed, and maximum gait speed of adults aged 50+ in Ireland using explainable machine learningen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/romerooren
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/rkennyen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/hernandben
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/siknighten
dc.identifier.rssinternalid234093en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2021.754477en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeAgeingen
dc.subject.TCDThemeCreative Technologiesen
dc.subject.TCDThemeDigital Engagementen
dc.subject.TCDThemeNext Generation Medical Devicesen
dc.identifier.rssurihttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnetp.2021.754477/abstracten
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0002-3882-7447en
dc.subject.darat_impairmentAge-related disabilityen
dc.subject.darat_impairmentChronic Health Conditionen
dc.subject.darat_impairmentHearing impairmenten
dc.subject.darat_impairmentMental Health/Psychosocial disabilityen
dc.subject.darat_impairmentMobility impairmenten
dc.subject.darat_impairmentPhysical disabilityen
dc.subject.darat_impairmentSensory impairmenten
dc.subject.darat_impairmentVisual impairmenten
dc.subject.darat_thematicHealthen
dc.subject.darat_thematicThird age/ageingen
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.contributor.sponsorScience Foundation Ireland (SFI)en
dc.contributor.sponsorGrantNumber18/FRL/6188en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/97515


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record