Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMc Namara, Deirdreen
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T15:09:31Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T15:09:31Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.date.submitted2022en
dc.identifier.citationLeenhardt R, Koulaouzidis A, Histace A, Baatrup G, Beg S, Bourreille A, de Lange T, Eliakim R, Iakovidis D, Dam Jensen M, Keuchel M, Margalit Yehuda R, McNamara D, Mascarenhas M, Spada C, Segui S, Smedsrud P, Toth E, Tontini GE, Klang E, Dray X, Kopylov U., Key research questions for implementation of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy., Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 15, 2022, 17562848221132683.en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractBackground: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly infiltrating multiple areas in medicine, with gastrointestinal endoscopy paving the way in both research and clinical applications. Multiple challenges associated with the incorporation of AI in endoscopy are being addressed in recent consensus documents. Objectives: In the current paper, we aimed to map future challenges and areas of research for the incorporation of AI in capsule endoscopy (CE) practice. Design: Modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey. Methods: The study design was based on a modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey distributed to a group of CE and AI experts. Round one aimed to map out key research statements and challenges for the implementation of AI in CE. All queries addressing the same questions were merged into a single issue. The second round aimed to rank all generated questions during round one and to identify the top-ranked statements with the highest total score. Finally, the third round aimed to redistribute and rescore the top-ranked statements. Results: Twenty-one (16 gastroenterologists and 5 data scientists) experts participated in the survey. In the first round, 48 statements divided into seven themes were generated. After scoring all statements and rescoring the top 12, the question of AI use for identification and grading of small bowel pathologies was scored the highest (mean score 9.15), correlation of AI and human expert reading-second (9.05), and real-life feasibility-third (9.0). Conclusion: In summary, our current study points out a roadmap for future challenges and research areas on our way to fully incorporating AI in CE reading.en
dc.format.extent17562848221132683.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries15en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectCapsule endoscopyen
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.titleKey research questions for implementation of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/mcnamaden
dc.identifier.rssinternalid248480en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221132683.en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDThemeNext Generation Medical Devicesen
dc.subject.TCDTagARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEen
dc.subject.TCDTagCapsule Endoscopyen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-3324-3382en
dc.subject.darat_thematicHealthen
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/101756


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record