Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMc Namara, Deirdreen
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-03T10:07:11Z
dc.date.available2023-01-03T10:07:11Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.date.submitted2022en
dc.identifier.citationMcCarthy E, Sihag S, Deane C,Walker C, Semenov S, Ryan B,Breslin N, O'Connor A, O'Donnell Sarah, McNamara D, Single or double headed capsules for the investigation of suspected small bowel bleeding: Are two heads better than one., Frontiers in Gastroenterology, 1, 2022, 1071797en
dc.identifier.otherYen
dc.descriptionPUBLISHEDen
dc.description.abstractBackground: Capsule endoscopy is now the accepted first line investigation for suspected small bowel (SB) bleeding. Recent evidence suggests the diagnostic yield for SB pathology may be higher for tailored double headed (DH) SB capsules. Whether other forms of bidirectional capsules offer a similar advantage is less clear. Aim: To compare the efficacy of single headed versus bidirectional capsules in detecting pathology in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods: A single centre prospective comparison study was conducted over an 8 month period in a tertiary care hospital. Patients referred with overt or suspected SB bleeding were assigned to either SB3 Medtronic SB capsule (SH) during the initial four months or PillCam Colon 2 Medtronic capsule (DH) during the subsequent four months. Studies were analysed by trained Capsule Endoscopists and approved by our institutions capsule review board. Findings were compared between SH and DH capsules using a chi2 or t-test as appropriate. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: 201 subjects were included, mean age 61.8 years, 90 (45%) male. Majority referred with occult bleeding, 153 (76%). DH and SH capsule used in 100 and 101 cases, respectively. 90% (n=181) capsules were complete and overall diagnostic yield was 57% (n=114). Diagnostic yield was similar between both groups - DH 53% (n=53), SH 60% (n=61). Positive finding in overt bleeding; SH 85% (n=22) versus DH 50% (n=11), p<0.02. SH capsules more frequently detected SB inflammation, 27 (27%) versus 9 (9%), p<0.002. More patients had another diagnosis in the DH (19) than the SH (9), p<0.04, the majority were type 1a vascular lesions, “red spots” or diminutive colonic polyps. Conclusion: Single head and double head capsules perform similary in terms of diagnostic yield overall. This supports the continued use of standard small bowel capsules for investigation of the small bowel.en
dc.format.extent1071797en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Gastroenterologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries1en
dc.rightsYen
dc.subjectvideo capsule endoscopyen
dc.subjectsuspected small bowel bleedingen
dc.subjectsingle or double headed capsuleen
dc.subjectsmall bowel accessen
dc.subjectGI bleedingen
dc.titleSingle or double headed capsules for the investigation of suspected small bowel bleeding: Are two heads better than one.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.type.supercollectionscholarly_publicationsen
dc.type.supercollectionrefereed_publicationsen
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurlhttp://people.tcd.ie/mcnamaden
dc.identifier.rssinternalid249839en
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fgstr.2022.1071797en
dc.rights.ecaccessrightsopenAccess
dc.subject.TCDTagCapsule Endoscopyen
dc.identifier.orcid_id0000-0003-3324-3382en
dc.subject.darat_thematicHealthen
dc.status.accessibleNen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2262/101922


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record