dc.contributor.author | Davies, Andrew | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-19T10:41:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-19T10:41:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2023 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Perceau-Chambard E, Roche S, Tricou C, Mercier C, Barbaret C, Davies A, Webber K, Filbet M, Economos G, Validation of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in cancer patients: factorial structure, reliability and responsiveness, PLoS ONE, 18, 2023, e0286947 | en |
dc.identifier.other | Y | |
dc.description | PUBLISHED | en |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Breakthrough cancer pain should be properly assessed for better-personalized treatment plan. The Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool is a 14-item tool validated in English developed for this purpose; no French version is currently available and validated. This study aimed to translate it in French and assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (BAT-FR).
Methods: First, translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 14 items (9 ordinal and 5 nominal) of the original BAT tool in French language was made. Second, assessments of validity (convergent, divergent and discriminant validity), factorial structure (exploratory factor analysis) and test-retest reliability of the 9 ordinal items were done with data of 130 adult cancer patients suffering from breakthrough pain in a hospital-academic palliative care center. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimension scores derived from these 9 items were also assessed. Acceptability of the 14 items was also assessed on the 130 patients.
Results: The 14 items had good content and face validity. Convergent and divergent validity, discriminant validity and test-retest reliability of the ordinal items were acceptable. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of total and dimensions derived from ordinal items were also acceptable. The factorial structure of the ordinal items had two dimensions similar to the original version: "1-pain severity and impact" and "2-pain duration and medication". Items 2 and 8 had a low contribution to the dimension 1 they were assigned and item 14 clearly changed of dimension compared with the original tool. The acceptability of the 14 items was good.
Conclusion: The BAT-FR has shown acceptable validity, reliability and responsiveness supporting its use for assessing breakthrough cancer pain in French-speaking populations. Its structure needs nevertheless further confirmation. | en |
dc.format.extent | e0286947 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | PLoS ONE; | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 18; | |
dc.rights | Y | en |
dc.title | Validation of a French version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in cancer patients: factorial structure, reliability and responsiveness | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.type.supercollection | scholarly_publications | en |
dc.type.supercollection | refereed_publications | en |
dc.identifier.peoplefinderurl | http://people.tcd.ie/andavies | |
dc.identifier.rssinternalid | 264133 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286947 | |
dc.rights.ecaccessrights | openAccess | |
dc.subject.TCDTheme | Cancer | en |
dc.subject.TCDTag | Palliative Medicine | en |
dc.identifier.orcid_id | 0000-0003-4207-4799 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2262/107333 | |